January 27, 2008 | In Politics |
Despite his long-shot status, the libertarian-leaning U.S. Presidential candidate, Ron Paul, is making a good run at the Republican nomination. In the past few days, he’s come second in both the Nevada and Louisiana caucuses, and won first place in a straw poll by the Alabama Republican Assembly, confounding many pundits who expected his campaign to collapse weeks or months ago.
But Paul’s strong base of mostly-young grassroots supporters has succeeded in keeping him in the race with more than $25 million in donations over the past few months. (Were I an American citizen, I likely would have participated and thrown a few bucks his way. :))
Now, with Ron Paul among the final five Republican candidates for President, people are starting to ask themselves what might happen if he actually wins the race. Analysts and political scientists have interjected a dose of negativity, suggesting that Paul’s uncompromising, ideological positions would effectively create gridlock in the houses of Congress, and undermine his ability to lead the nation effectively.
“Congress would, to an extent, operate without him,” said Cal Jillson, a political science professor from Southern Methodist University. “He would easily be overridden by a two-thirds majority of both houses. He might be kind of lonely.”
But, as many supporters have said, this campaign isn’t about Dr. Paul as a person (despite his intelligence and refreshing attitude). It’s about the message of individual freedom, personal responsibility, and preservation of the U.S. Constitution (which, by the way, we Canadians should be envious of).
If the “Ron Paul Revolution” is to succeed, it will not be based on one man. It will not be based on a momentary fad. If the thousands or Americans who are diligently campaigning for Dr. Paul today truly want to make a difference, they will need to continue their efforts into 2009, 2010, the next decade, and beyond – whether or not their candidate wins.
If Ron Paul wins the Presidency and his supporters sink into invisible complacency, then yes, it will be a hollow and meaningless victory resulting in years of gridlock. But if the message of freedom continues to echo throughout America and the world, something very different could happen.
If Congress becomes an obstacle, then the ongoing Revolution will have to change Congress by electing pro-freedom candidates, regardless of party affiliation or lack-thereof. Nobody is unelectable if enough people vote for them.
Those of us who believe in liberty – whether in America, Canada, or elsewhere in the world – need to stand for freedom and justice in every election year and every year in between.
There is a strong and growing sentiment amongst Ron Paul supporters (of whom I am one) that we need to front-load all levels of government with Ron-Paul-Republicans. Quite a number of people are beginning to step up willing to run on Dr Paul’s platform and who are garnering support.
What we have here is not a cult of personality but, rather, a rebirth of an ideology that many had thought (and hoped) was dead: the ideology of liberty, independence, constitutional government, and sound fiscal policy. This flies in the face of most of the social initiatives of the past 70 years - especially those started after the advent of the UN - and is based on the belief that social workers and the government know what os best for us. Our response is that, even if they do - which is highly dubious, they would be wrong to FORCE us to follow their path.
We have woken up to the fact that the muddle-headed liberal left has been pursuing an inconsistent line that demands personal responsibility without granting personal authority. As anyone with any kind of management experience can tell you, assigning responsibility without granting the associated authority is a recipe for failure - which is what we’ve had since this whole debacle began.
It is time we rolled back our government to where it is supposed to be: limited to the 17 enumerated powers in the constitution, and using amendments to make any changes necessary. We must stop writing the government a blank check, as we have been doing.
It is time, in short, to take back our government.
Comment by Dale — January 28, 2008 #